Tags: Wharton School Of Business CourseworkThe American West EssayInternational Baccalaureate Application EssayResearch Paper In Mechanical EngineeringWrite Honours ThesisOf Mice And Men Setting Essay PlanNature Photo EssayQuantum Computing Phd Thesis
This visitation / Is but to whet thy almost blunted purpose’ (3.4.110–11).
But when it came to killing Polonius, and sending Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their deaths, after finding his own letter ordering his death, that was easy and he acted on impulse. Was Hamlet enjoying acting insane and subconsciously did not want it to end therefore not really wanting to kill the king?
When Hamlet was in the graveyard and met the grave digger who had no sympathy for the dead which offended Hamlet, I agreed with Hamlet.
The retribution he happens to exact is exacted too late, moreover, to prevent all the deaths that need not have occurred, if only he had killed Claudius sooner.
As a direct or indirect result of his procrastination, Hamlet slays Polonius instead of Claudius; Ophelia goes mad after her father’s murder and drowns; Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dispatched by Hamlet to their deaths; and in the play’s climactic duel Hamlet’s mother drinks from the lethal cup intended for her son, who is fatally wounded by Laertes in revenge for the deaths of his father and sister.
On the face of it, it’s hard to resist the conclusion most critics have drawn, which is that the main cause of the whole tragic train of events is Hamlet’s compulsion to postpone.
And for those who assume that to be the case, all that remains is to crack the conundrum with which the play confronts them: why does Hamlet delay?
The deaths of the innocent father and daughter cause another to seek revenge, Laertes.
Laertes wants to avenge the deaths of his father and sister.
In trying to accomplish it he kills an innocent man, Polonius.
In result, the daughter of Polonius and former lover of Hamlet, goes mad and kills herself.