The Common Core demands students think critically while staying connected and diving into text, yet employers desire workers who can think creatively while connecting with people as they dive into their work.In college and careers students will often face the challenge of answering open-ended questions rather than text-dependent ones.Standards should serve as a flexible framework to meet the academic, social, emotional, and vocational needs of diverse learners and NOT a forced march to meet the data driven demands of standardized tests.
The Common Core demands students think critically while staying connected and diving into text, yet employers desire workers who can think creatively while connecting with people as they dive into their work.Tags: Essays On MothersEssay About Fast FoodExtended Essay Abstract Included Word CountEssay About Social InequalityGeneral Essay RequirementsRhetorical Analysis Essay StructureSmart EssayEssay Writing ProcedureHow To Write A Research Paper Proposal Example
But in life there are trade-offs, and I would be willing to accept a somewhat less ideal outcome for the most-challenged students if it meant tremendously better life outcomes for their peers.
It is odd that reformers who fervently support the Common Core with its mandate of college and career readiness for ALL students would express views that excuse the most challenged segments of our student population from meeting these higher standards.
To be sure, this raises tough questions for the system as a whole.
As I said in the video, there are reasons to be concerned that district schools will become the last resort for the toughest-to-serve kids.
The reason to celebrate these schools and the role they play is because the traditional system has been downright hostile to the needs of such striving children and families…tracking or ability grouping is seen as elitist; any effort to provide special classes, environments, or challenges for motivated or high-achieving kids is cast as perpetuating inequality—, and even though there’s a ton of evidence that high achievers do best around other high achievers.
And now these “social justice” types want to berate schools for asking disruptive students to leave.Wasn’t the rationale for adoption of the Common Core that higher standards would serve as an academic rising tide that will lift all boats regardless of condition, design, or years at sea?Or is it possible that the Common Core, which lacks meaningful career and technical standards or pathways, is intentionally designed to prepare cognitively privileged and standardized students for college and post-college careers while the “marginal” learners in our schools will be encouraged to apply at Dave and Buster’s?For sure, there should be checks on pushing kids out willy-nilly… public schools have gone too far in the direction of accommodating the disruptors at the expense of everyone else?But let’s not forget about the needs (even rights) of the other kids to learn. Or been guilty of “defining deviancy down,” in Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s words?What if our own hyper-credentialed life experiences and ideologies are blinding us to alternative pathways to the middle class? We shouldn’t force anyone into that route, but we also shouldn’t guilt kids with low odds of college success—regardless of their race or class—to keep trudging through academic coursework as teens…Rather than pretend that we’re going to get “all students” to “climb the mountain to college,” we should build a system that helps many students find another road to the middle class—a path that starts with a better prekindergarten-through-eighth-grade education and then develops strong technical and interpersonal skills in high school and at community colleges.Supporters of the Common Core continue to claim it will prepare students for colleges and careers despite numerous surveys, reports, and research (evidence) that employers are seeking workers who think creatively…Overwhelmingly, both the superintendents of schools who educate future workers and the employers who hire them agreed that creativity is increasingly important in U. workplaces, and that arts training—and, to a lesser degree, communications studies—are crucial to developing creativity…Employers look for employees who reinforce their creativity by showing certain characteristics in the selection process: Able to look spontaneously beyond the specifics of a question (78 percent) Respond well to hypothetical scenarios (70 percent) Able to identify new patterns of behavior or new combination of actions Integrate knowledge across different disciplines Show ability to originate new ideas Comfortable with the notion of “no right answer” Fundamentally curious Demonstrate originality and inventiveness in work Show ability to take risks Tolerant of ambiguity Show ability to communicate new ideas to others Supporters of the Common Core may point to standards that call for creative and divergent thinking yet the multiple choice questions on the Common Core standardized tests DISCOURAGE and DISCOUNT such thinking as they have only one right answer and plausible responses are graded as wrong.Paul Bruno, a supporter of the Common Core responded to this concern…And it’s also likely that, Common Core notwithstanding, our dropout rates will increase in the coming years since they are currently at an all-time low and an improving economy will give marginal students better alternatives outside of school.